Interview with Allison Wolfe

By Danielle Eisenman                  

Allison Wolfe is considered to be one of pioneers of the Riot Grrrl movement. Raised in Olympia, Washington, Allison created the influential zine Girl Germs with Molly Neuman, with whom she later formed the band Bratmobile. Allison has since recorded a number of albums and singles with other bands, notably the Washington D.C. based Partyline. She also initiated Ladyfest, a music and arts festival for female artists.

Danielle Eisenman: I’ve done some feminist-y stuff like writing a few songs and poems myself. I’m fond

 of the whole “Olympia” way—that you got to experience in your young adulthood—of doing stuff 

for fun, not really having to be like, you know—

Allison Wolfe: To be a professional.

DE: Yeah.

AW: Yeah, I’m very fortunate for growing up in

 that town– a small, liberal-arts focused college town with the history of interesting people and artists and women trying to be doing things. A lot of people 

would just kind of perform, or read a story at parties, and there would be parties 

with themes where people were supposed to stand up and do a quick performance. And there

 was never any approach for it to be professional sounding or skilled in any certain way. Just the idea that anyone can and should be creative and should have something to say, and that it

 can sound interesting and cool or whatever and not have to be super skilled… I think I was very 

fortunate to have been immersed in that community. Otherwise I don’t think I would have 

thought that I could be in a band, or that I could actually do anything around something that I was 

very amateur at. It supported amateur creativity.

DE: Revolutionary bands like Bratmobile, Bikini Kill, Bangs, or just any other Riot Grrrl band

hold a very important place in my heart and mind, and I feel it should be the same for everyone!

AW: Aw!

DE: How did the punk message relate to Riot Grrrl?

AW: Yeah, punk rock had a lot to do with– how we (Riot Grrrls) saw the world with

 our politics and our daily beliefs and things. I think at the time we were very politicized and

 thought that politics and the political aspects of music were important to us. And I think a lot of 

us come from a punk rock history. And I think that that sort of history of punk is really bringing 

down the barriers, tearing down the walls, and confronting authority, and looking for a world 

that is more based on equality. That is what everyone was always taught growing 

up, that everyone is equal and blah, blah, blah. But when you grow up and look 

around, you can see that no one’s equal. No one’s treated equal and no one has been given 

equal qualities in life. We live in a very higher-optical society. And a lot of that is the problem of 

corporate capitalism. I don’t know, I think that these days, it’s hard to be, I mean, I am older, and 

not as involved in the music scene as I used to be, but I still go to see bands play, and 

sometimes I still play myself. But I haven’t lately. I don’t really see that there are 

very many bands now, in general, that are coed or all girl bands who are very political.

DE: There are a lot of “modern rock” boy bands that are good for nothing but easy listening, and 

not that many really political bands; male or female. It’s disappointing.

AW: Not much. There is a cool girl that I know named Karen who puts on shows

 that are very decidedly feminist. She’s really cool. I think her organization that she runs

 is called “Strength and Numbers.” You should be able to Google that; just “Strength and

Numbers.” She’s

 very feminist and very confident about it. She really goes for having events that are more

 politicized in an outward way, you know. But you’re right. It is disappointing and I feel disappointed,

 about that too. I just don’t see anything going on. Even though there are a lot of bands now 

and they sound pretty, they just don’t—they’re not very political and it’s been going on for a

while. I think there was a huge political backlash in late 1990’s after Riot Grrrl had ‘come and gone’ after Grunge and everything. Everyone had started trying to be 

un-political. But then we had had eight years of the Bush administration. They were 

horrible times, really. They were being really conservative and really hard on a lot of people. I 

feel like people should have been screaming on the streets and doing a lot more. I mean there

 were a few massive protests, but it just never felt like enough. I feel like the punk rock and

alternative music communities should have stepped up and spoken out more. 

There weren’t any overtly political bands during the first eight years, you know during 2000 

to 2008. I suppose now, with Obama, people think that they can just do what they want, but

Republicans are taking over Congress. Before, they had at least eight years to do whatever 

they wanted and they were completely un–apologetic about it. Why should we work with them

 now? They just want to take away all of our rights as citizens. And human rights as well. I just

 think the music scene should talk about these issues and be more confrontational.

DE: I’ve gone around at school asking people what they thought about feminism. Usually, their first reply is “What’s a feminist?” Yes, it’s just a name, a label, whatever. But I still feel it’s a pretty basic thing 

that people just don’t address. Usually, with boys I talk to, they come up with the worst excuses. Somebody that

 I asked replied with, “Girls have all of the rights they need! You know what they can do that men

 can’t? They can give the gift of life!”

AW: Well, people who don’t see what we (girls) do are always going to say something like that.

They just don’t understand. They have no clue what being a girl in society is like at all. People who haven’t had to live it or experience it are often completely ignorant about what it might 

feel like, and the privileges he has, he thinks are just normal and everyone has that. But, I think 

people who are privileged are blind. They don’t see how other people experience the world.

Unfortunately, this society will never make men learn what it’s like to be a woman. It won’t be

 able to make white people know what it feels like to be a person of color. Or, rich people won’t

 know what it’s like to be poor. The list goes on and on…

DE: Most boys don’t have the normal, everyday worries that us girls do. They don’t hear the

 voices in their heads telling them “You’re not strong enough to do this!” or, “You can’t learn this!”

or, “You’re not worthy enough!”

AW: It’s also just that, the professors of our society get more subtle impressions and get 

the more obvious things from our past, but that’s not really the problem. The thing that

 people don’t think about is that even though women are seen as somewhat equal and are

 populated in equal numbers, we still aren’t paid as much as men for any job. It really can’t

 be argued. Women just really aren’t paid as much as men. We don’t have equal

 economic power. And, on top of that, women are still raised in this traditional role where we

 are exposed to unfairness in the media. We are told that our bodies are our selling points and 

having to look a certain way is the most important thing. And even if our

 parents try hard not to raise us that way, TV, ads, and billboards… everything

 still points to basically the explanations of women’s bodies. Half the women you see in the

 media are women half-clothed, whereas men are mostly fully clothed. And that’s difficult, you know?

 That is why it is not equal: the images are not equal. And on TV, it’s always the woman’s dead

 body that starts the story– it’s never men. Women always end up murdered by their 
husbands, boyfriends and ex-boyfriends. Domestic violence is a huge issue. But

 no one ever wants to realize it, or talk about it. You know, it’s

just like, God! And you just have to deal with all of it.

DE: My mom works in an office where she is the only woman. She says that there’s a HUGE

 difference between the way she’s treated and the way her male co-workers are treated. What 

do you have to say about that?

AW: It’s similar with women in music. More and more, you have women in bands, but you still 

don’t have a lot of all-girl bands. And the bands which are mixed genders tend to be received better and get more airplay. They are taken more seriously.

 Their musical abilities aren’t as questioned as much. With all-girl bands 
it tends to be more that if people think they’re good they’ll just act all surprised,
 and be like “Oh wow! She can actually play guitar!” They never say that about men. And 

I’ve seen so many bad boy-bands who are bad in so many different ways. Whether it’s either

 performance, or the lyrics, or their skill, or whatever, and they play every night at 

every bar, or every club. And no one ever sits there going “Oh wow, they are such a bad band,”

or “I’m surprised that he can actually play the drums.” But, girls in music are always talked about 

in that way. Because no one can believe that they can actually do something.

DE: My mom has always shied away from the term “feminist.” It’s like feminism has been

 somehow passed off as man-hate, or wanting to be a man.

AW: Well, some people have that idea, but I think that if you just look at the study of feminism,

 you would quickly find out that that’s not the truth. I think that the only reason 

reason it could be called man hating is because men feel threatened by it, so they 

call it man hate. I think that if a man feels threatened by feminism they probably have a sexism 

problem and maybe he should check himself out, you know? I just feel that to reject feminism is to kind of reject yourself. It’s almost like self hate. We live in a society that encourages 

that. It encourages people to second guess themselves and to hate themselves and to fight against 

each other. We are taught that we must all compete for that one position, that space

 available for only one of us. Men are given all of the room in the world. They’re always 

taught that the world is for them, that the world is their oyster and there’s room for all of them,

you know? But women are always confined in space and we’re told to fight against each other

 and to compete because there is not enough room for all of us.

DE: I heard that being a Riot Grrrl had a lot of downsides and the live shows were pretty violent,

at least for Bikini Kill. It seems like any band with powerful women would have problems, like

 Hole, for instance. Was that true with Bratmobile, too?

AW: I heard about some violence and stuff at Bikini Kill shows. It wasn’t Bikini Kill’s fault, and

 they certainly did not instigate the violence at their shows. It was usually men having a very 

strong reaction to Kathleen Hanna’s confrontational lyrics. Unfortunately, a lot of people reacted

 negatively to that. I think it wasn’t any more violent than it is out there in the world in regular

 society. I think that there are a lot of violent men that are kind of violent all the time, but they 

look for places (like Riot Grrrl shows) to let it out. If they’re going to feel threatened at Bikini Kill

 show, maybe they’ll let it out there. Bratmobile didn’t really have too much trouble with that. I

 mean, I don’t really have great eyesight, and my hearing isn’t too great either, and on stage,

the lights from the club are often pointing directly into your face, so I can’t always see

 what’s going on out there. There probably were some weird things happening, and some guys 

being gross or something, but I wasn’t always aware of it. I was pretty oblivious. The great thing

 about being on stage or being a headstrong Riot Grrrl is that you have the microphone, and 

you have the power to be louder than anyone else. They have to listen to you and you don’t

 really have to listen to them. I didn’t usually witness or see any of that. Although, the second 

show that we ever played was opening up for the Melvins and I know that Kathleen was in the 

audience and she told me that a lot of guys were really bummed that a girl band was 

opening up for the Melvins. And they didn’t get it; whereas, the Melvins loved having a band like 

us. They didn’t like all of these stupid boy bands opening for them anyways. I think their audience

 was a little freaked out by us. Kathleen said that she could hear people yelling in the audience 

that they wanted to kill us. Luckily I didn’t hear any of that at the time.

DE: Did stuff like that do anything to your self-esteem? Did it make you shy away, or want to

 fight back even more?

AW: I think it usually had the effect of making us want to fight more. At first, it’s a little 

disappointing to hear that people don’t like you or your band. But we just thought “Okay, they’re

 really scary, ignorant people,” and yeah, it just made me want to fight back and just be louder,

and more obnoxious. I know one time, when Bratmobile was touring with the Donnas during the first Bush election, if you want to call it an election. 

We were in Dallas, Texas, and I said something against Bush on stage, and afterwards,

our rhodie came up to us who was selling our merch, a little guy, and he said “Hey, a bunch of 

big scary jocks have been coming up to me, yelling about the things you said on stage.” They 

said ‘Hey, this is Bush country and you should tell your singer to shut up,’ and they were really 

threatening him. My response was to just talk more about Bush on stage, and I yanked out a 

pen, blacked out one of my teeth, and I drew a mustache on and just kind of was being crazier.

Often, that is my reaction. I’m just like “Okay, you want to fight?” you know? Not

 that I want to be violent, or anything, I’m sure I would probably get beat up in two seconds if I

 tried to fight, but I believe in being confrontational to our society and that you should always just

 step up the confrontation if people are trying to shut you up when you know that you’re right.

DE: Was there anything you gained from Riot Grrrl? What good things did you get from it?

AW: One thing that was important that I got from Riot Grrrl, and from being in the different bands 

that I was in and writing fanzines, is self-esteem within myself 

and other girls. I think that a lot of girls suffer from self-esteem problems during the middle school

 years. I felt that in my own life. Being in a band and yelling on stage and stuff—it did help with my self-esteem 

and stuff. Riot Grrrl was kind of encouraging more self-esteem in all girls. And it was just kind 

of reminding people, you know, don’t keep it all inside. If you’re feeling really crazy, or if you’re

 feeling like the world is against you, or you really have something to say, you’re not crazy, you’re not wrong, and it’s really just the society that’s messed 

up; not you. Don’t let the society mess you up and make you think that you’re wrong, or that

 you’re a bad person or that you’re insignificant, or you’re not equal, or something, you know? I 

think it’s really important that it was helping girls raise their self-esteem, and it was also a great

 community. We sat around a lot where we had meetings and did activities and talked about 

politics, you know, all sort of politics. It was a really important political awareness time for all of 

us and a community building time. We would network with a bunch of girls and bands all over 

the country and that was before the internet. We were doing that through fan mail.

DE: Did you ever doubt yourself in Riot Grrrl?

AW: Oh yeah! I still doubt myself. Probably less so then because we were at an age where we 

felt like we could take on the world, and we were all in women’s studies 

classes and various political classes in college at the time. We were learning so much, and you

feel so self-righteous when you realize how messed up the world is. We were given all 

of the tools we needed and the words to talk about it in an academic sort of way. So, I think we 

felt pretty righteous in what we were doing and felt that it was important, and it meant the world

 to us. We thought it should mean the world to everyone else, too. I think, in a lot of

ways, we were pretty confident, but we didn’t think that we had all of the answers and we knew 

that there was a lot more to find out. We also knew because of our own personal experiences 

and backgrounds that our experiences were limited. We knew that we could reach out to a lot of

 girls who were sort of alternative minded and in to punk rock music. We didn’t think that what

 we were doing wouldn’t speak to all girls and women in the whole world. I think we just saw 

ourselves as a strain of feminist struggle. You know, one small part, but still an important 

part. I thought that even if we could just change the attitude and the hearts and minds of people

 within our own town, we could beam within our own community, you know?

DE: Is there anything else you want to add?

AW: Just that it was a strain of what people call “Third Wave Feminism,”

 but it was still primarily girls who were in a somewhat punk rock scene. It was really

 just a type of feminism where we were struggling against sexism within the punk rock scene. 

But also, we were interested in academic feminism and often taking classes at universities

 about feminism. But, I think we often felt that sometimes, the language of academic feminism 

didn’t really speak to our lives in a simple, young girl, punk rock sort of way. The thing I think we

 were trying to do with Riot Grrrl was to find (or create) an intersection/cross-section between

 punk and feminism. We felt that the punk rock scene was still somewhat of a boys’ club (sexist,

 as society is) and that the academic feminist world didn’t always speak to our experiences as

 young punk girls. So basically, we wanted to make feminism more punk, while making punk

more feminist. Much academic feminist dialogue seemed to skip the experiences of young

 girls altogether, or to not really validate girls until they come of age as adult women. We also 

believed in reclaiming words, images, portrayals that had often been used against women or

had been seen as sexist, and using those things to confront a sexist society and expose a more 

complicated feminist consciousness. It seemed more realistic and exciting, provocative.

DE: Okay, thank you so much for giving me the chance to interview you! You were the model interviewee!

AW: You’re welcome! No problem!

Advertisements

7 Comments on “Interview with Allison Wolfe”

  1. Mike says:

    We (I’m a man) aren’t threatened by real feminism or feminists. I think Virginia Woolfe (not to be confused with Allison Wolfe) is a truly formidable women and I admire her. The problem we have is that there are some women who either dislike men or feel uncomfortable around them, and they have hijacked the name ‘feminism’ to justify their own personal scorn and vendetta. Modern feminism has largely been subverted by women (and some men) with disingenuous motives. This is bad for both men and for the real feminists.
    To summarise – I support TRUE feminism, I DON’T support people hiding behind the term with ulterior motives.
    I could make the comparison to some religious groups using religion as a method to control and manipulate people, while claiming to be trying to help.

    • Horfat says:

      “Kuivan asiallinen tyyli? Te4me4 kaiekroitunetden poikien palstako asiallinen? Sallinette minun ke4ke4tte4e4, hekoheko.”No onhan te4me4 asiallinen samalla tavalla kuin vaikkapa teologinen “tiede” on asiallista. Pyrite4e4n jonkinlaiseen johdonmukaisuuteen, leikite4e4n objektiivisuutta ja viljelle4e4n sivistyssanojakin. Mutta le4htf6oletukset ja -uskomukset kumpuavat jostakin syvyyksiste4, eike4 niihin ole pe4e4sye4 ellei ole asianomaisen kultin je4sen.

    • Ricardo says:

      that her Jewish identity was shaepd by WWII and the Holocaust, and who fought for a woman’s right to keep her job while pregnant instead of being forced to get an abortion, would be in favor of eugenics. Or if they’re just hoping that the conservative audience will be so eager to believe evil of a liberal that no one will bother to check.[1] Her statement in the interview was:Yes, the ruling about [the law forbidding the use of Medicaid for abortions] surprised me. Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong. Note to conservatives: When someone says there was concern, that does not mean the same thing as I was concerned. [2] See joined by Justice Ginsburg, which begins by railing AGAINST America’s sordid experimentation with eugenics as a way to destroy the disabled. I note that if the Court engaged in a more expansive enquiry as The Chief Justice suggests, post, at 15 (dissenting opinion), the evidence to be considered would underscore the appropriateness of action under a75 to address the situation of disabled individuals before the courts, for that evidence would show that the judiciary itself has endorsed the basis for some of the very discrimination subject to congressional remedy under a75. Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), was not grudging in sustaining the constitutionality of the once-pervasive practice of involuntarily sterilizing those with mental disabilities. See id., at 207 (“It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind… . Three generations of imbeciles are enough”). Laws compelling sterilization were often accompanied by others indiscriminately requiring institutionalization, and prohibiting certain individuals with disabilities from marrying, from voting, from attending public schools, and even from appearing in public. One administrative action along these lines was judicially sustained in part as a justified precaution against the very sight of a child with cerebral palsy, lest he “produc[e] a depressing and nauseating effect” upon others. State ex rel. Beattie v. Board of Ed. of Antigo, 169 Wis. 231, 232, 172 N. W. 153 (1919) (approving his exclusion from public school).1Many of these laws were enacted to implement the quondam science of eugenics, which peaked in the 1920’s, yet the statutes and their judicial vindications sat on the books long after eugenics lapsed into discredit.2 See U.S. Civil Rights Commission, Accommodating the Spectrum of Individual Abilities 19—20 (1983). Quite apart from the fateful inspiration behind them, one pervasive fault of these provisions was their failure to reflect the “amount of flexibility and freedom” required to deal with “the wide variation in the abilities and needs” of people with disabilities. Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 432, 445 (1985). Instead, like other invidious discrimination, they classified people without regard to individual capacities, and by that lack of regard did great harm. In sustaining the application of Title II today, the Court takes a welcome step away from the judiciary’s prior endorsement of blunt instruments imposing legal handicaps.

    • Ferid says:

      awww! she’s so cute! We have two cats and I’ve had cat’s my whole life, sometimes their ateitudts are the funniest things! Thanks for the sweet comment on my blog!Lisa

  2. Jen says:

    I become a bigger fan of riot grrrl the more time passes and the more experiences I have as a woman. I really like Bratmobile and Partyline. Allison is right about the all girl bands. It’s still something special to this day unfortunately. I am a female guitarist but I find that most women aren’t like myself. I have really only played guitar with guys and once one of them insulted another by saying “She’s better than you and she’s a girl!” I sometimes wish I was a guy but what I really mean by that is I wish I was treated equally.

  3. [url=http://www.rcpartner.no/Parajumpers/][b]http://www.rcpartner.no/Parajumpers/[/b][/url][url=http://www.rudvi.se/parajumpers/index.asp][b]http://www.rudvi.se/parajumpers/index.asp[/b][/url][url=http://mulberrybag.wabpse.org][b]http://mulberrybag.wabpse.org[/b][/url][url=http://wabpse.org][b]http://wabpse.org[/b][/url][url=http://www.fundacionmozambiquesur.org/templates/ugg.html][b]http://www.fundacionmozambiquesur.org/templates/ugg.html[/b][/url][url=http://www.fundacionmozambiquesur.org/includes/moncler/][b]http://www.fundacionmozambiquesur.org/includes/moncler/[/b][/url][url=http://www.strandbad-amriswil.ch/contract/menu.html][b]http://www.strandbad-amriswil.ch/contract/menu.html[/b][/url][url=http://www.elch.ch/awstats/content.php][b]http://www.elch.ch/awstats/content.php[/b][/url][url=http://www.friedlishofladen.ch/application/header.php][b]http://www.friedlishofladen.ch/application/header.php[/b][/url][url=http://www.abenas.ch/phocadownloadpap/default.html][b]http://www.abenas.ch/phocadownloadpap/default.html[/b][/url][url=http://www.architekturbauleitung.ch/content/default.php][b]www.architekturbauleitung.ch/content/default.php[/b][/url][url=http://www.appaloosastaldecormeulen.nl/moncler-jassen/][b]http://www.appaloosastaldecormeulen.nl/moncler-jassen/[/b][/url][url=http://www.saladeonline.nl/UGGS-Kopen/][b]http://www.saladeonline.nl/UGGS-Kopen/[/b][/url]

  4. Aside from administration of antibiotic treatment, antimicrobial treatment may also be suggested.
    They become problematic when circumstances that cause them
    to grow quickly and out of manage exist.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s